- 15 May 2023
- 6 min read
Will The NHS Exist In Name Only If Staffing Shortage Predictions Come True?
Subscribe
A leaked NHS workforce plan has predicted that without substantial investment in training and recruitment, by 2036, staff shortages in the health service for full-time or equivalent staff could reach 571,000.
That 571,000 would be equivalent to over a third (37%) of the NHS’ current workforce of 1.6 million.
The plan predicts that if current workforce trends persist, by 2036 the NHS will be unable to manage the increasing demand for care that will result from both a growing and ageing population. Rural health services, which are already facing difficulties attracting sufficient staff, may be unable to operate.
Should the scope of what treatment the NHS is able to offer be reassessed, and if so, do you think that it would be politically survivable for a government to be perceived as removing the ‘universality’ of the NHS?
Could This Be Prevented?
To prevent such a deterioration in service provision, the NHS plan advocated for investment in training to improve and develop the workforce. The plan estimated that the total number of NHS staff being trained per year needed to grow by 55%, from just over 66,000 to just over 102,000.
In addition, the plan also recommended that the number of nurses trained each year should rise by 77% and the number of medical school places in the UK be doubled, rising from 7,500 to 15,000.
If the plan’s recommendations were to be accepted, is there a concern that the additional funding required would need to come, at least in part, from existing budgets?
About this contributor
Nurses.co.uk Founder
I launched Nurses.co.uk (and subsequently Socialcare.co.uk, Healthjobs.co.uk and Healthcarejobs.ie) in 2008. 600 applications are made every day via our jobs boards, helping to connect hiring organisations recruiting for clinical, medical, care and support roles with specialist job seekers. Our articles, often created by our own audience, shine a light on the career pathways in healthcare, and give a platform to ideas and opinions around their work and jobs.
More by this contributorWant to get involved in the discussion?
Log In Subscribe to commentBlessing Esekie
Blessing Esekie
2 years agoThis as indicated is far worse than what's seen on the surface. The issue should be disaggregated before solution is ... read more
This as indicated is far worse than what's seen on the surface. The issue should be disaggregated before solution is proferred . Firstly, what are the issues with enrolment if healthcare workers, interests,funding, loans, unhealthy study Environment including placements,presence of other encouraging benefits or the lack thereof? Secondly, what are the issues with recruitment and retention within the UK, are the ropes too tight and measures stringent that coping with work life balance makes it far difficult to accept recruitment terms and or to sustain jobs. I have worked with a few colleagues who have left their fulltime jobs just like myself not because of the actual clinical jobs or duties but from politics and policies that make the work environment quite toxic to continue. The clinical leaders are hardly supported to be supportive, the culture thrives in fault finding rather than support systems within the work place, junior staff go home feeling "less than" , they battle within themselves for lack of support and struggle with balancing their mental health and keep up with other aspects of their lives such as being parents etc, they end of bailing out inorder regain a healthy existence, the list can go on... Thirdly, for international recruitment, the gaps in knowledge will become more palpable with less than optimal training and or mentoring. A fall out of international recruitment is the family that arrive with these professionals, adding to the burden of population explosion, I estimate that for every 1 professional recruited from overseas we have an average of 4 dependent member arriving with and they in turn will be needing health care, eventually further wearing down the ratio of health professional to population of people served. Finally, remuneration as a clear reflection of cost of living as present state is not encouraging, there are no active incentive to encourage professionals ignore all other factors and remain with the NHS. I live and work in Barrow-in-Furness, there is a BAE system here, shipyard and other works, including project management, I have seen apprentices in this system earn more than band 6 nurses, and following the graduation from apprenticeship, a staff without university education who only had apprenticeship then earn more than a band 7/8 nurse and goes ahead to afford a house in less than a year of full time staffing, and this is easily a 9-5 job maximum of 40hrs/week without back breaking , unsocial hours tasks, no panels challenging them on a regular as nurses and midwives experience because they are expected to be human enough to show xare and compassion bot robotic enough to leave their brain and their fingers on the computer typing away error-free inorder to avoid being called into the office and challenged for "policy " issues. The job of a clinician is long, arduous and not just thankless but challenging leaving you second-guessing yourself when stepping back into the office....and the
read less