- 25 June 2019
- 3 min read
Coroner demands NHS 111 changes after death of six-year-old
SubscribeSebastian Hibberd died after call handlers failed to recognise he was suffering from a serious condition.

A coroner has warned more children in England could die unless the NHS takes action after call handlers missed several opportunities to save the life of a six-year-old boy.
Sebastian Hibberd died after staff failed to spot warning signs that part of his bowel had collapsed, before he suffered a cardiac arrest at home while waiting for medical treatment.

A Prevention of Future Deaths Report has now demanded NHS England and NHS Digital carry out a review of their procedures, saying call handlers were not being “adequately assisted” by the algorithm used to assess patients over the phone.
Action is required to prevent further deaths
Senior coroner Ian Arrow said in the report: “In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken.
“Following the inquest I received submissions that without changes in the NHS Pathways the 111 call handlers will not be adequately assisted by the Pathways to recognise the acutely unwell child.”
An inquest into the little boy’s death in February heard his father, Russell, contacted NHS 111 on the morning of October 12, 2015, after Sebastian began throwing up green vomit, had cold hands and feet, stomach pain and was confused and delirious – all signs of a child suffering from intussusception.
111 call handlers failed to identify life-threatening signs
But call handlers failed to recognise the boy’s condition as life-threatening in repeated calls until his father again contacted them five hours later.
Sebastian suffered a cardiac arrest at his home in Plymouth while waiting for treatment but was declared dead after being taken to Derriford Hospital.

The coroner later gave a narrative conclusion for his death.
Mr Arrow said in his report: “In particular, it is more likely than not, had his condition been recognised and he had received treatment treatment at 8.44am, his life might have been preserved.
“By the time the seriousness of his condition was recognised at 13.54pm it was less likely that his life could be preserved.”
About this contributor
Nurses.co.uk editorial team
Bringing you a daily update of nursing, NHS, health and social care news from around the UK.
More by this contributorWant to get involved in the discussion?
Log In Subscribe to comment