BackBack to menu

Forgotten password

Enter your email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password

Niche Jobs Ltd Privacy Policy is a job advertising website run by Niche Jobs Ltd. Niche Jobs Ltd is not an employment agency and does not undertake such activities as would be consistent with acting as an agency.

This privacy policy applies only to this website. If you do not accept this privacy policy, you must not use the website. A user will have been deemed to have accepted our Privacy Policy when they register their details on the site, or set up a job alert emails.

We are committed to ensuring our user's privacy in accordance with the 1998 Data Protection Act, as well as ensuring a safe and secure user experience.

Personal (identifiable) information

When users submit identifiable* information to the website they are given the choice as to whether they wish their details to be visible to companies advertising on the website.

  • By selecting 'Allow companies to contact me about jobs', this means that a user's information, as it is entered on the website, may be viewed by companies who use our CV Search tool or watchdog function. At no point does Niche Jobs Ltd distribute a user's information to third parties beyond what we may be legally obligated to do.
  • By selecting 'I don't wish to be contacted about jobs by companies looking to hire', this means that a user's information will only be visible to a company advertising on the site if a user applies to a job being advertised by that company.

Whilst Niche Jobs Ltd makes every effort to restrict CV access to legitimate companies only, it cannot be held responsible for how CVs are used by third parties once they have been downloaded from our database.

  • Identifiable information is anything that is unique to a user (i.e. email addresses, telephone numbers and CV files).

Niche Jobs Ltd may from time to time send email-shots on behalf of third parties to users. Users can unsubscribe from mailshots using the unsubscribe link in the email or by contacting Niche Jobs Ltd via the Contact Us page on the website.

Non-identifiable information

Niche Jobs Ltd may also collect information (via cookies) about users and how they interact with the site, for purposes of performance measuring and statistics. This information is aggregated, so is not identifiable on an individual user basis.

Users may choose to accept or deny cookies from Niche Jobs Ltd, but users should be aware that if cookies are not permitted it may adversely affect a user’s experience of the site.

Removal of stored information

Niche Jobs Ltd reserves the right to remove user information from the database if that information is deemed obsolete or used in a way that is detrimental to the performance of the website or the reputation of the business as a whole.

A user may remove their details by selecting the 'Remove my account' option from their account menu, or by requesting the removal of their details via the 'Contact Us' link on the website. A confirmation of this removal will be sent to the user by Niche Jobs Ltd.

If you have any questions regarding this privacy policy, you may contact us at:

Niche Jobs Ltd.
30-34 North Street
East Sussex
BN27 1DW
United Kingdom

For Advertisers:

Niche Jobs Ltd makes every effort to ensure that advertiser details are kept safely and securely.

Advertiser details are kept in our secure database and are not distributed to third parties without express permission. Payment details are securely stored in third party systems.

This Privacy Policy is correct as of March 2016.


Share this article

Transparency (or not) in the Health and Social Care Act

Transparency (or not) in the Health and Social Care Act

The on-going refusal and recent veto of a Freedom of Information request for the Health and Social Care Act risk register by the Government has been a startling and politically unusual incident. What does this augur?

The risk register is a document that outlines the likely risks and potential casualties (such as NHS nursing jobs) that will be caused by changes to the NHS stemming from the Health and Social Care Act. Attempting to veto its release would seem a very strange step indeed.

The Freedom of Information request was made by John Healey, the former shadow health secretary, and in turn the Government had made an legal appeal against it's release in March 2012. Healey has been quoted as saying “This is a desperate act which will backfire badly. It is an admission of defeat on the legal arguments for public release."”

The appeal was lost and it was ruled that the Government should release the information as requested. Instead of complying with this legal ruling, the Department of Health has refused thus far to release the document and recently took the unusual step of vetoing it entirely. The current health secretary, Andy Burnham, deemed the on-going refusal an “outrageous insult to [the process of] parliament”.

This kind of veto has only been used three times since the 2000 Freedom of Information Act; twice concerning Scottish devolution and once concerning the Iraq War. It is designed to be used in 'exceptional circumstances' and the information commissioner is due to present a formal report soon determining if circumstances were indeed exceptional.

A spokesperson stated that the previous refusal to release was due to the Department of Health wanting to understand the details behind the court ruling before complying with it. Moreover, they cited concern for the impact that releasing risk registers may have on the process of developing bills, suggesting that they would become “anodyne” and inoffensive.

Concerns surrounding the Government's proposal for the Health and Social Care Act have mounted during since it's introduction in January 2011, particularly as the idea of the Bill was not mentioned in general election manifestos nor the coalition agreement.

Broadly, it will remove PCTs and SHAs and give their funding to CCGs (Clinical Commissioning Groups), partially composed of GPs. It will also alter NHS language to allow commissioning groups to commission services from “any willing provider” instead of the current “any qualified provider”.

This change is designed to increase choice and decrease bureaucracy but critics are concerned that a competitive market of “any willing provider” for services will prioritise cost as a determining factor for service provision, rather than aptness or genuine service user choice.

This change could also instigate some economic instability. The “any willing provider” model removes contractual obligations to pay for a certain level of services. Instead, the NHS does not have to pay X amount for Y services and the providers are paid on an individual usage basis.

For instance, those in NHS nursing jobs could end up either highly over-pressured or twiddling their thumbs as public choice regarding their nursing will be unpredictable and without contractual expectations.

Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, called himself a “firm believer in great transparency” but argued that ministers needed a “safe space” to hash out plans without civil servants “worrying” about how they were worded.

It is possible the register will be released in the future under the '30 years rule'. This rule refers to when Cabinet documents are moved from a secure, private holding into the National Archives. However, the Government can decide that certain documents still are better kept undisclosed.

Andrew Lansley has gone on to state that he will publish a document of information that explains more about risks in the register and what the Government has done to deal with them.

Recommended, Similar Jobs

Clinical Lead

Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex, England
Caring Homes Group

Registered Nurse

Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
Nothing But Recruitment Ltd

Intellectual Disability Nurse

Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
TTM Healthcare

Related Jobs